Is Nuance L&H II?

Nuance Communications continues to be a house-of-cards that is likely to come crashing down.  The only question is when.  Nuance does not generate GAAP profits.  It shows proforma profits by excluding a huge amount of stock compensation. Naive investors buy the stock based on distorted information from top management, but knowledgable management keeps selling the stock. The growth rate is inflated through acquisitions that are enormously over-priced.  A lack of transparency and distortion of the truth by Nuance top management continues to make it a challenge to figure out just what Nuance is really doing.>>
>
The activities of Nuance Communications bear a striking resemblance to what L&H was doing prior to imploding in early 2000.  >>
>
Belgian-based L&H was once the world's leading maker of speech technology software. In early 2000, reports of accounting irregularities surfaced that prompted arrest of the company's founders. It sought reorganization under bankruptcy laws in the United States and LACE w:st="on">BelgiumLACE>. The situation led in October to the firm being declared insolvent and its assets being put up for sale. >>
>
A few of the more obvious similarities are 1) a highly aggressive M&A program that was attempting to eliminate competitition and 2) constant distortion of reality by the corporate management.>>
>
The two companies routinely grossly overpaid for acquisitions that were being made.  They then attempted to distort this.  For example: Nuance is paying $160 million for SnapOn and is then attempting to distort this by measuring with speculative future revenue contributions. >>
>
The furious acquisition pace made it virtually impossible to understand what was actually happening at L&H.  This is the same for Nuance.  The acquisitions serve as a cover for the “shell game” that Nuance is playing.>>
>
Some of the specific items that suggest that Nuance is heading for an L&H-type finale are:>>
>
·                     Top management dumping Nuance stock;>>
·                     No historical GAAP profits;>>
·                     No GAAP profit in sight;>>
·                     GM deterioration means that hemoraging will continue;>>
·                     Gross violation of FASB 131; >>
·                     Long-term Nuance CFO departing with no explanation and his $3M stock sale; >>
·                     New Nuance CFO comes from bankrupt/defunct company;>>
·                     Nuance gross margin continually declining;>>
·                     Nuance license revenue is collapsing;>>
·                     Unable to compete in market so Nuance attempts to compete in the courtroom;>>
·                     Nuance attempts to destroy innovation by suing competitors;>>
·                     Nuance investing in litigation rather than R&D;>>
·                     Acquisition targets refusing Nuance, even with huge premium;>>
·                     Nuance patent portfolio is mostly a fraud;>>
·                     The Nuance Move into outsourcing is high-risk;>>
·                     CEO comments about good partner relations suggest either ignorance or deceit>>

 
Trackbacks
  • No trackbacks exist for this entry.
Comments

  • 10/6/2008 1:31 PM some netter wrote:
    Wow, quite the analysis. I believe you're way off base. Did Ricci fire you or something?
    Reply to this
  • 10/10/2008 12:35 PM Walt Tetschner wrote:
    You should offer some facts to support your conclusion that you believe that I’m “way off base”. I’ve offered my facts and they present a compelling case for concluding that Nuance is heading for the same fate as that of Lernout & Hauspie who went bankrupt in 2000. I’ve never worked for Paul Ricci, so he certainly didn’t fire me. I’ve also never worked for a Nuance competitor.

    As a consumer advocate, my motivation for doing this is to attempt to stop the predatory/monopolistic behavior of Nuance that is hurting the industry and consumer.
    Reply to this
  • 10/13/2008 11:01 AM Industry guy with questions wrote:
    Rather than a list of bullets, can you be a little more detailed? For example, you make the claim that "Acquisition targets refusing Nuance, even with huge premium" so I would ask which companies are refusing Nuance's huge premium deals? Also, Nuance is active in the courtroom, but the opposuite view is that Nuance is protecting its inevstments (according to you, it overpaid for its acquisitions, but doesn't it only make sense that it would try to protect the IP that it paid such a high price for?). How else does a company protect its IP if it doesn't take percieved infringers to court? I do think Nuance is overly aggressive with its lawsuits, but saying protecting ones IP is symptomatic of a house of cards is a stretch (just my opinion). Can you be more specific with your claim that they are in "gross violation of FASB 131"? If this were the case, teh SEC would be all over them and I am wondering why they are not. I'd love to see your deeper analysis of these claims. I'm not disputing what you are saying (although I do disagree with a lot of it), but I do want to share in the details of your analysis/claims. After all, you are saying that transparency is key, no? So, how about a litle transparency in your analysis. Thanks
    Reply to this
    1. 10/14/2008 11:14 PM Walt Tetschner wrote:
      Sure – plenty of detail exists to support each of the items in the analysis. We will be presenting the details in the coming weeks. Voice Signal is an example of Nuance paying over 30x trailing revenue. Nuance 1st attempted to acquire Voice Signal. When Voice Signal rebuffed the Nuance offer, Nuance then turned around and sued Voice Signal for patent infringement. The patent had questionable validity and Voice Signal was not infringing. Nuance is not protecting their IP. They are suing simply to damage a smaller competitor that is beating them in the marketplace by being more innovative. This was the same thing that Nuance has recently done with vlingo. vlingo is whipping them in the marketplace because they have a superior technical approach. Since Nuance can’t compete in the marketplace, they attempt to win by dragging a tiny competitor into an expensive legal defense that is a diversion from the innovation that they have been doing and not something that a tiny company can afford. Aside from the fact that the patent has quite questionable validity and vlingo does not appear to be infringing, Nuance isn’t even using the patent in their own products. What Nuance is doing is engaging in anti-competitve behavior that violates the entire basis of the US patent system which is to encourage innovation and competition.

      If you read FASB 131 and then study a Nuance financial report, it is totally apparent that Nuance is completely violating FASB 131. Your comment re ‘the SEC hasn’t gone after them so that must mean that they are innocent’ must be a joke. Given the track record of the SEC in being proactive in going after violations, I’ve got to believe that you weren’t being serious.
      More detail on Nuance violating FASB 131 in the next note.
      Reply to this
    2. 10/14/2008 11:19 PM Walt Tetschner wrote:
      Nuance Violating FASB 131
      It is obvious that they have four distinctly different business areas that are each greater than 10% of the total business and they should be broken out separately. It is apparent that they have four (4) distinctly separate business units that have different products, distribution channels and customers. Any sort of reasonable assessment would suggest that Nuance manages the operations of these businesses separately and that the financial results for these individual businesses should be available. The gross violation of the FASB 131 guideline appears to be an attempt to avoid transparency and would suggest that Nuance has things to hide. I have been pounding on them for well over a four years on this and have never received even an attempt to rationalize why they are violating the FASB 131 guideline. The only reason that I can imagine is that, by not reporting the business units separately, they are able to more readily play financial shell games. Ricci will state that the embedded segment grew 34%, Enterprise was up 53%,…. and it is never quite certain what he means - yet they refuse to report as required by the FASB 131 guidelines.
      Violating the reporting requirements of FASB 131 appears to simply be part of the Nuance strategy of avoiding transparency and openness.
      Reply to this
  • 3/26/2009 12:33 PM Jon wrote:
    The activities of Nuance Communications bear a striking resemblance to what L&H was doing prior to imploding in early 2000.
    Reply to this
  • 3/26/2009 12:35 PM Jon wrote:
    http://portal-world.net
    Reply to this
  • 8/15/2009 2:03 PM London Escort Agencies wrote:
    Nuance Communications Inc was being talked about, but in a good way. Its shares rose after an analyst upgraded the stock, due to improving growth prospects for its technology in the mobile phone and other markets. Broadpoint AmTech's Brad Whitt raised his recommendation to "buy,'' saying "Nuance is the clear market leader for speech recognition technology.'' He expects it to meet or exceed third quarter analysts' expectations for earnings of 25 cents per share.
    Reply to this
  • 9/1/2009 3:50 AM manuel de jeux de casino wrote:
    You should offer some facts to support your conclusion that you believe that I’m “way off base”. I’ve offered my facts and they present a compelling case for concluding that Nuance is heading for the same fate as that of Lernout & Hauspie who went bankrupt in 2000. I’ve never worked for Paul Ricci, so he certainly didn’t fire me. I’ve also never worked for a Nuance competitor.
    Reply to this
  • 9/7/2009 2:51 PM Bulk sms wrote:
    Nuance develops its own voice-recognition software and it said it would use Jott to expand its portfolio of mobile voice services. The company specifically said it would package Jott Assistant with its voicemail-to-text solution, along with other voice services, and offer the products together to mobile operators.
    Reply to this
  • 9/12/2009 8:27 AM plumber city wrote:
    I haven't any word to appreciate this post.....Really i am impressed from this post....the person who create this post it was a great human..thanks for shared this with us.i found this informative and interesting blog so i think so its very useful and knowledge able.I would like to thank you for the efforts you have made in writing this article. I am hoping the same best work from you in the future as well. In fact your creative writing abilities has inspired me.Really the blogging is spreading its wings rapidly. Your write up is fine example of it
    Reply to this
  • 9/25/2009 3:54 AM sex movies wrote:
    Some great stuff.Nuance develops its own voice-recognition software and it said it would use Jott to expand its portfolio of mobile voice services.
    Reply to this
  • 10/7/2009 3:59 AM anti aging products wrote:
    I am very glad to see such information which I was searching for a long time.This made very glad..This site has given us an useful information..
    Reply to this
  • 10/7/2009 4:02 AM best teeth whitening products wrote:
    Very interesting site..Useful information shared..Iam very happy to read this article..thanks for giving us nice info..Keep up the work..
    Reply to this
  • 10/7/2009 4:05 AM free music download websites wrote:
    I enjoyed reading it. I need to read more on this topic..Thanks for sharing a nice info..
    Reply to this
  • 10/7/2009 4:07 AM work at home jobs wrote:
    You have provided answers for almost all the questions I had in my head.I need to read more on this topic..Thanks for sharing a nice info...
    Reply to this
  • 10/7/2009 6:00 AM wine gifts wrote:
    Fantastic walk-through. I appreciate this post.There is obviously a lot to know about this. I think you made some good points in Feature also
    Reply to this
  • 10/7/2009 6:20 AM teeth whiteners wrote:
    Very interesting post..Iam very much enjoyed by reading your site..this article has provided a useful info..Thanks for the info given..
    Reply to this
  • 10/10/2009 5:39 AM www.giococasinointernet.com wrote:
    Excellent post you have here.PageRank has also been used to rank spaces or streets to predict how many people (pedestrians or vehicles) come to the individual spaces or streets.Thanks for sharing this article.
    Reply to this
  • 10/13/2009 12:08 PM green tea benefits wrote:
    Useful information shared..Iam very happy to read this article..thanks for giving us nice info.Fantastic walk-through. I appreciate this post.
    Reply to this
  • 10/21/2009 10:49 AM four seasons wine wrote:
    Very interesting post to hang on..Iam really impressed with this article..Looking for more info..
    Reply to this
  • 10/21/2009 11:56 AM software developer wrote:
    That was inspiring,

    keep up the good work...

    Thanks for bringing this up
    Reply to this
  • 10/23/2009 8:19 AM SEO wrote:
    Where can i get the online US GAAP information?
    Reply to this
  • 10/23/2009 8:27 AM Hosting wrote:
    Detail about US gaap. what are the list and details of US accounting standards ?
    Reply to this
  • 10/25/2009 1:15 AM the wine club wrote:
    The info that u have given in this blog is really impressive..Iam very happy to visit ur blog..
    Reply to this
  • 10/25/2009 1:30 AM green tea extract wrote:
    I enjoyed reading it. I need to read more on this topic...I admiring time and effort you put in your blog, because it is obviously one great place where I can find lot of useful info..
    Reply to this
  • 10/28/2009 12:19 AM 4 seasons wine club wrote:
    Nice post.I like the way you start and then conclude your thoughts. Thanks for this information .I really appreciate your work, keep it up
    Reply to this
  • 10/28/2009 9:52 AM english school new york wrote:
    The product on offer combines what the Suradians describe as "the core Surado CRM suite including Contact & Account Management, Sales & Opportunity Management, Marketing and Customer Service." Far from trying to market simply another stripped down bare-bones "budget" package, Surado officials characterize the product as delivering "convenience, power and flexibility for businesses looking to move beyond simple, under-powered single user and work group" products.
    Reply to this
  • 10/29/2009 2:22 AM Bulk Sms wrote:
    A few of the more obvious similarities are 1) a highly aggressive M&A program that was attempting to eliminate competition and 2) constant distortion of reality by the corporate management.
    Reply to this
  • 10/30/2009 4:01 AM wine tasting wrote:
    I just stumbled upon your blog and wanted to say that I have really enjoyed reading your blog posts.Thanks for sharing this information about Goa in the Monsoon I really enjoy reading on it.
    Reply to this
  • 11/2/2009 2:36 AM monthly wine club wrote:
    I will bookmark your blog and take the feeds also...Very interesting post to hang on..Iam really impressed with this article..Looking for more info..
    Reply to this
  • 11/3/2009 6:24 AM american cellars wine club wrote:
    I enjoyed reading it. I need to read more on this topic..Thanks for sharing a nice info..Any way I am going to subscribe to your feed and I hope you post again soon.
    Reply to this
  • 11/3/2009 2:30 PM Apartments Barcelona wrote:
    I just read the article that a friend posted, well i gotta say it definitely makes you wonder thats for sure, but if its true which would be awesome, that is just a cool thing to know, another reason to want to get into motorcycle riding haha. But hey would it then (if this is true) help with memory like short term or long term, just curious. Any info can be good info.
    Reply to this
  • 11/6/2009 2:47 AM online games wrote:
    Belgian-based L&H was once the world's leading maker of speech technology software. In early 2000, reports of accounting irregularities surfaced that prompted arrest of the company's founders.
    Reply to this
  • 11/13/2009 9:00 AM SEO Reseller wrote:
    How information on relationship between Humans and apes has changed your understanding of the human condition?
    Reply to this
  • 11/14/2009 9:04 AM Narrative Essay wrote:
    Thank you very much for the information provided on this Argumentative Essay! I was looking for this data for a long time, bit I was not able to find the trusted source
    Reply to this
  • 11/14/2009 9:05 AM Argumentative Essay wrote:
    found your site on del.icio.us today and really liked it.. i bookmarked it and will be back to check it out some more later ..
    Reply to this
  • 11/15/2009 8:09 AM Buy Research Papers wrote:
    Great article but personally I don't even like twitter. After a while reading from the top to down, now I got new idea for my own blog. Thanks it becomes my inspiration.
    Reply to this
  • 11/15/2009 8:39 AM Argumentative Research Paper wrote:
    Thank you very much for the information provided! I was looking for this data for a long time, bit I was not able to find the trusted source
    Reply to this
  • 11/15/2009 8:48 AM Narrative Essay wrote:
    I think rite now we need to promote entrepreneurship as it has great potential for growth. Thanks
    Reply to this
  • 11/16/2009 3:20 AM Escorts London wrote:
    Nuance Communications can help you see the subtle differences in both speech and images. The company provides speech and digital imaging software. Its speech products include speech recognition systems used to provide customer service, embedded systems used in applications ranging from automobiles to consumer electronics, and dictation systems. Nuance's digital imaging line includes document creation
    Reply to this
Leave a comment

 Enter the above security code (required)

 Name

 Email (will not be published)

 Website

Your comment is 0 characters limited to 3000 characters.